I agree with you Dustin that we won’t get any movement on federal sports betting legislation with a republican trifecta taking over but the possibility of cooperation with democrats in bipartisan legislation is possible….. As far as the negative bet discussion, I see it similar to Colorado and how https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1Ib3Gn_xKcmuIJ9tjKKE8MJJNNYGFpwS-Eo1x9ZwHpL4/htmlview?pli=1# they got rid of certain ones….. Either way a lot of states in their legislatures/ gaming commissions will focus on adjusting the legislation in 2025 and I don’t know in my state of Nevada I’m not sure what they’d do on a state level but federally Titus opposes any federal legislation and Cortez masto and Rosen as well so I’d think they’d oppose it or get a exemption eg paspa if we see it.
I would honestly rather see just getting rid of college player props rather than “negative” player props. Although I hate that too and it just cedes the market to offshore and fantasy parlays.
I agree with you Dustin that we won’t get any movement on federal sports betting legislation with a republican trifecta taking over but the possibility of cooperation with democrats in bipartisan legislation is possible….. As far as the negative bet discussion, I see it similar to Colorado and how https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1Ib3Gn_xKcmuIJ9tjKKE8MJJNNYGFpwS-Eo1x9ZwHpL4/htmlview?pli=1# they got rid of certain ones….. Either way a lot of states in their legislatures/ gaming commissions will focus on adjusting the legislation in 2025 and I don’t know in my state of Nevada I’m not sure what they’d do on a state level but federally Titus opposes any federal legislation and Cortez masto and Rosen as well so I’d think they’d oppose it or get a exemption eg paspa if we see it.
I would honestly rather see just getting rid of college player props rather than “negative” player props. Although I hate that too and it just cedes the market to offshore and fantasy parlays.